 |
New Rules for Response to the Office Action
made on Chinese Trademark Application
It was recently stipulated by the Chinese Trademark Office that
the applicant of a trademark application shall, when making a response
to an Office Action, follow the new rules below:
1. The applicant may delete some listed items of goods/services,
or narrow the scope of listed goods/services, but not broaden same.
2. The applicant shall not make any amendments to the mark itself,
except for deleting the markings like "TM" or "?",
etc.
3. If the mark contains the name of the applicant's enterprise,
the parts known to the public shall be deemed to have been disclaimed
automatically. To disclaim other parts of the mark, the applicant
shall make a written statement.
4. If the mark contains generic names or designs of the goods/services,
or has direct reference to the quality, main raw materials, function,
use, weight, quantity or other features of the goods/services as
prohibited in the items 5 and 6, paragraph 1, Article 8 of the Trademark
Law, the applicant shall state to disclaim those prohibited items.
5. The amendments made to the trademark application will be limited
to only once. In the case that no amendments have been made or amendments
have not been made timely or after amendments have been made, the
application is still deemed not meeting the relevant requirements,
the application will be refused.
Increase of Official Fees for Patent Application in China
Starting from March 1, 2001, the respective official fees re the
processing of Chinese patent application will be increased on an
average for around double those of the current tariffs. Our attorney
fees, however, remain unchanged. Some important items are indicated
below for special attention:
|
S/N
|
Item
|
Invention
|
Utility Model
|
Design
|
|
Current
Fee(RMB)
|
New
Fee(RMB)
|
Current
Fee(RMB)
|
New
Fee(RMB)
|
Current
Fee(RMB)
|
New
Fee(RMB)
|
|
1
|
Filing Fee
|
490
|
950
|
300
|
500
|
250
|
500
|
|
2
|
Surcharge for claims in excess of 10,
per claim
|
30
|
150
|
30
|
150
|
-
|
-
|
|
3
|
Request for examination
|
1200
|
2500
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
4
|
Request for invalidation
|
600
|
3000
|
400
|
1500
|
300
|
1500
|
|
5
|
First extension of time, per month
|
150
|
300
|
150
|
300
|
150
|
300
|
|
6
|
Second extension of time, per month
|
N/A
|
2000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
7
|
Restoring right
|
300
|
1000
|
300
|
1000
|
300
|
1000
|
* According to the current exchange rate, US$1 is about RMB8.27
For those applications for invention that the requests for substantive
examination have not yet been made, we strongly encourage the applicant
file the request before March 1, 2001 so as to save a large amount
of examination fee (RMB1300) per case.
Under the new rule, the second extension of time will be available
for response to the office action made on the patent application
for invention. However, the official fee for the second extension
will be very expensive, i.e.,RMB2000 per month. Therefore, it is
advisable to avoid the second extension unless absolutely necessary
to do so.
As the annuities for invention, utility model and design patents
have also been increased, those annuities due after March 1, 2001
will also be charged according to the new tariffs no matter which
are paid prior to or after March 1, 2001.
Besides, the official fee for restoring a right, such as right for
claiming priority, right for making response to the official notice,
right for entering into Chinese national phase for a PCT application,
etc., has been significantly increased as well. What we would like
to suggest is to make a timely action meeting various time limits,
so as to avoid possible request for restoration of right.
|










 |